What Is Business Regulation and Control

Barack Obama. “Executive Order 13563 – Better Regulation and Regulatory Review.” National Administration of Archives and Documents. 18 January 2011. Retrieved 14 June 2017, obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/18/executive-order-13563-improving-regulation-and-regulatory-review. Promote, where appropriate, legislative coherence through coordination mechanisms between supranational, national and subnational levels of government. Identify cross-cutting regulatory issues at all levels of government to promote coherence between regulatory approaches and avoid regulatory duplication or conflict. The U.S. government has enacted numerous trade regulations to protect workers` rights, protect the environment, and hold corporations accountable for the power they have in a highly business-oriented society. “The chairman speaking on behalf of the commission stressed that it has now “taken a difficult step from unscrupulous prosecutions to a leadership role that invites, encourages and stops the efforts of the U.S. economy to monitor itself.” 6 As explained below, there are other interests whose regulatory protection is considered important, such as.B. environment, service standards, consumer services, maintenance and exchange of assets, etc. Economic Development Committee, “Crony Capitalism: Unhealthy Relations Between Business and Government,” October 14, 2015 (www.ced.org/reports/single/crony-capitalism-unhealthy-relations-between-business-and-government).

Infrastructure regulation is usually discussed in the context of economic regulation. The functions of economic regulation are typical: in addition, in some industries outside the advertising sector, there are limited programs that have also tried to address specific commercial abuses through voluntary codes of conduct. Examples of such concerted industry action, regardless of government involvement, have been voluntary programs to define trade names, set objective standards, and ensure appropriate disclosure to buyers. More ambitious self-regulation has also been undertaken by video producers, by the various stock exchanges and by organised sports. These groups are constantly trying to anticipate criticism by revising and updating their business ethics. These programs have been tolerated by the government, although they have sometimes been challenged by private complainants.27 Commit to an explicit whole-of-government policy on regulatory quality at the highest political level. Policies should have clear objectives and implementation frameworks to ensure that, in the case of enforcement, economic, social and environmental benefits justify costs, take into account distributive effects and maximise net benefits. If the government is trying to boost investor confidence in a sector, then the discretion of a regulator (especially a new body that has no track record) in carrying out its duties is crucial. Private investors will seek checks and balances that must be built into the legal framework of regulation, and even government assurances, such as: It is true that the courts have approved limited agreements of businessmen to collect and disseminate statistical and other business information to ensure more informed competition in the market.10 In addition, the exchange of other data, sanctioned to enable fraud detection.11 Nevertheless, the courts have even condemned the overly generous disclosure of confidential information to other members of an industry,12 and condemned an overly friendly discussion of competition decisions.13 From there, the judiciary has eliminated most other programs that involve more than the usual public information activities of trade associations for improve industry standards. For example, inter-trade agreements on the disposal of substandard goods14 and the imposition of ethical codes of conduct15 have been banned. Truth in Advertising Laws consist of dozens of pieces of information under three main requirements: advertising in the United States must be truthful and not misleading; Companies must be able to substantiate claims in advertisements at all times; and advertising must be fair to competitors and consumers. In addition, in accordance with the Fair Trade Packaging and Labelling Act of 1966, all product labels must contain information about the product, nutritional value.

B size, distribution and manufacturing information. However, we conclude that a disproportionate emphasis has been placed on a more in-depth examination of the new rules (starting from the general assumption that there is too much regulation overall), perhaps at the cost of underutilization to expand the practice of retrospective review (and too little recognition than regulations in the diversity of cases, which develop over time, can be suboptimal in many ways). As the world changes (including, but not limited to, technological advances), regulations, even those based on principles rather than narrow and specific rules, can become obsolete and even counterproductive. It`s no surprise that regulatory experts around the world have cited retrospective review as one of the areas in which other countries have made progress, and the United States, while remaining a world leader, has lost some of its comparative advantage. We believe that our country needs to invest more in the ongoing review of its regulatory stock and in data and other resources to support it. Account should also be taken of the content of primary law and what may be left to secondary law. Secondary law is generally subject to less parliamentary scrutiny and can be changed more easily than primary law, so investors may feel less comfortable when key issues are left to secondary law. We believe that such a cost-benefit analysis is the gold standard for the regulatory process.

We are concerned that some alternative decision-making rules, however well-intentioned, will lead to worse results. For example, an aggregate regulatory budget or regulatory cost cap could lead to perverse results. A new regulation whose benefits outweigh the costs could be rejected by a cost cap or an aggregate regulatory budget. At the same time, however, the old rules, whose costs outweigh their benefits, would be protected from a cost cap or budget solely because of their mandate. Similarly, a “pay-as-you-go” regulatory rule that required the repeal of one regulation before the imposition of another could delay a fully justified regulation. Arnold Kling, “Why We Need Principles-Based Regulation,” American Enterprise Institute, May 22, 2012 (www.aei.org/publication/why-we-need-principles-based-regulation/). However, for service providers providing essential services such as water and/or electricity, there is a view that regulated assets should be closed by high-risk undertakings and that, where the supplier carries out unregulated activities, they should be limited to a small percentage of the total activity of the water supplier or carried out in a separate limited liability company. The problem of biased, ineffective and outdated rules could be better avoided if policymakers adopted a comprehensive strategy of favouring principles-based regulation over rules-based regulation, which would be more immune to the abduction and manipulation of vested interests. The use of industry know-how in this way to distinguish and condemn an illegal practice or an affirmative requirement of ethical competition – if it is subject to the Commission`s powers to examine, revise and, where appropriate, publish this industry proposal – should go a long way towards launching industrial reform on a sound legal basis. Therefore, if each member of the industry agrees with the Commission to comply with the published judgment, the obligation of contractual arrangements can be added to persuade public sanctions in order to achieve the salutary result desired by companies and governments.


© 版权声明
  • 暂无相关文章